Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Anne Martinez's avatar

Something to note about the Stonewall National Monument is that it does seem to be factually correct to have information about it not reference trans people. The people involved were primarily gay men. Assertions that "a black trans woman threw the first brick at Stonewall," although popular memes, do not seem to be based in historical fact.

Expand full comment
Steersman's avatar

> "It’s unfortunate we need to clarify sex in law but it’s good that we are getting this done."

Indeed. Justice Alito in the Skrmetti case suggested that a "protected class" needs to be based on an "immutable" trait to make that protection work. And the Alabama definition for female, in particular, is based such a trait even if they're rather coy or evasive or unscientific about it.

Alabama Reflector: Female would be defined as a person “who has, had, will have, or would have, but for a developmental anomaly, genetic anomaly, or accident, the reproductive system that at some point produces ova.”

https://alabamareflector.com/2025/02/12/alabama-house-approves-bill-defining-sex-based-terms-sends-gov-kay-ivey/

Unfortunately, that definition conflicts with the biological definition for female which is likely to cause some problems down the road.

Why I've argued that they would be wise to change their focus and, instead, define "woman";as "adult human ovary-haver'. Virtually the same "immutable" trait but a definition that doesn't conflict with the biological one.

Expand full comment
10 more comments...

No posts