can exclude men, Stephen King mansplains math to JKR only to show he's bad at math, male rapist reported as woman by press, man loses lawsuit to be place with women general population
taking women roles just like the Kabuki did by banning women from their own artform yep ; out… just like in Shakespeare's day ; women roles the few that exist only played by men and castrati ; now we are regressing culturally .. again ; Women. who already incidentally struggle for equity, prizes recognition,representation of our sex ; our nurturing free unpaid roles; our discrimination and the abuse weve faced historically due to our innate sex! ( no Real biological women in the richest list ) In theatre and of course all over crap Netflix a paucity of women and senior seasoned womens art and framing of contemporary and historic perspectives - Men now coopted into coopting our few parts - thanks a lot Jinx ! I loved ya but no more am i gunna sign off on women face already only one or 2 great roles for women ; imagine senior women like Betty Davis today ???? Nuh gaslighting and crickets - millenia morons - we do not get wiser we are cast as mens handmaidens and we are villified as minor supporting cast off and distorted into the lobby trans tools- women called” breeders” ovens” ffff off - women wake the F Up !
Thanks for another great set of links -- keeping your ear to the ground, your finger on the pulse. 🙂 And for the archive links.
But while I appreciate that you're often quoting other sources, you might consider editing them somewhat, the Daily Mail article in particular which talks about "sex changes". Which is, as you put it, flat-out impossible. The phrase should be bracketed with 24-point scare quotes and further qualified with "AKA, sterilization and castration of autistic and dysphoric children". Truth in advertising ...
Though the Church of England has something of a point -- if a dude wants to "live as a male transvestite" then I guess he should be allowed to do so. But that should not in any way open the door to claims that he has changed sex and should be treated, socially or in law, as if he had done so. Crossing the Rubicon into crazy town.
But the response to the CoE positions is almost as clueless and scientifically illiterate as those peddled by various transloonie nutcases:
"Lucy Marsh, of the Family Education Trust, said: 'It is extremely concerning that the Church of England does not recognise that biological sex is immutable. Sex is not 'assigned at birth', it is determined at conception and recorded at birth. These are biological, unchangeable facts.' ..."
Unmitigated horse crap, politically motivated dogma, "scientific" howlers, and pretentious articles of faith. By standard biological definitions, the sexes are most certainly not "immutable", and technically we don't ACQUIRE a "sex category membership card" until the onset of puberty and can have those "cards revoked" anytime thereafter -- for example, transwomen who cut their nuts off turn themselves into sexLESS eunuchs. Hardly "immutable 🙄".
taking women roles just like the Kabuki did by banning women from their own artform yep ; out… just like in Shakespeare's day ; women roles the few that exist only played by men and castrati ; now we are regressing culturally .. again ; Women. who already incidentally struggle for equity, prizes recognition,representation of our sex ; our nurturing free unpaid roles; our discrimination and the abuse weve faced historically due to our innate sex! ( no Real biological women in the richest list ) In theatre and of course all over crap Netflix a paucity of women and senior seasoned womens art and framing of contemporary and historic perspectives - Men now coopted into coopting our few parts - thanks a lot Jinx ! I loved ya but no more am i gunna sign off on women face already only one or 2 great roles for women ; imagine senior women like Betty Davis today ???? Nuh gaslighting and crickets - millenia morons - we do not get wiser we are cast as mens handmaidens and we are villified as minor supporting cast off and distorted into the lobby trans tools- women called” breeders” ovens” ffff off - women wake the F Up !
Thanks for another great set of links -- keeping your ear to the ground, your finger on the pulse. 🙂 And for the archive links.
But while I appreciate that you're often quoting other sources, you might consider editing them somewhat, the Daily Mail article in particular which talks about "sex changes". Which is, as you put it, flat-out impossible. The phrase should be bracketed with 24-point scare quotes and further qualified with "AKA, sterilization and castration of autistic and dysphoric children". Truth in advertising ...
Though the Church of England has something of a point -- if a dude wants to "live as a male transvestite" then I guess he should be allowed to do so. But that should not in any way open the door to claims that he has changed sex and should be treated, socially or in law, as if he had done so. Crossing the Rubicon into crazy town.
But the response to the CoE positions is almost as clueless and scientifically illiterate as those peddled by various transloonie nutcases:
"Lucy Marsh, of the Family Education Trust, said: 'It is extremely concerning that the Church of England does not recognise that biological sex is immutable. Sex is not 'assigned at birth', it is determined at conception and recorded at birth. These are biological, unchangeable facts.' ..."
Unmitigated horse crap, politically motivated dogma, "scientific" howlers, and pretentious articles of faith. By standard biological definitions, the sexes are most certainly not "immutable", and technically we don't ACQUIRE a "sex category membership card" until the onset of puberty and can have those "cards revoked" anytime thereafter -- for example, transwomen who cut their nuts off turn themselves into sexLESS eunuchs. Hardly "immutable 🙄".